[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[jbovlaste] Re: proceed/continue/advance
- To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: proceed/continue/advance
- From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:05:34 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GVbd3FCBJKMQmO5gbXWVvj+mknvt4qO2T8i7tL3/5Hg=; b=aiwEWlbyFUzYAI9G7miVU/80MXAMo0QWOmhyTAmXv+8JyFZW9kP7srpQgebYLOi+0d gHIGj3+H+g3tgRwS8Y9MDgYPpvz3ElBmnRSVfM1cHNrmim9uzqsg3rU5MIkNCFmfzw2o nJ8LvvHrhVNM3diqyPm1WGSm2Ag09Je+oAt3Y=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EGgmXn5ASH4S5t99lZO7/KGySRr5vSO5KihzSVtyjUeZDMnvJM73/BbwAUl1ke7ZaA wE4Np/eyDJCxKJKLGCNb6SULZeWr8p7nzDEjuJbebBS7BbOFv4iZLNveS3DadigZ3DS7 lPASrnX2oECCOawLkd2Hv9BwqX1UpcL1ydQgo=
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTikyormhAUaV=G1nwaxn=TnEE0zHX08kL=dc51PJ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <AANLkTikyormhAUaV=G1nwaxn=TnEE0zHX08kL=dc51PJ@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Michael Turniansky
<mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm leaning towards lamyzu'e --
> z1 proceeds/continues/advances/takes the next step l1=z2 in sequence of
> actions l3 towards goal z3 after step l2
>
> But I'm not really liking it..
> Opinions? Better options?
>
> It feels like it should be pruce-based, but I can't figure out how.
toldenpa?
x1 proceeds (from?) x2 with step/action x3 towards ending finishing x4
mu'o mi'e xorxes