[jbovlaste] Re: Music terminology

["A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>]

> 
> On 25 March 2011 14:37, A. PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
> > 1) nolzgi
> > z1=n1 the classical music performed at/by z2 (event) originating in culture 
>n1
> > from
> > z1=n1 zgike z2 gi'e nobli n2
> 
> Does this include non-Western "noble" music (e.g. Chinese court music)?

Yes.  Classical music everywhere was written either for or under the patronage 
of the nobility.
> 
> 
> > 3) ninzgi
> > z1=n1 the pop music performed at/by z2 (event)
> 
> There are many forms of music that have been new and innovative but
> aren't classified as pop (e.g. glitch).

I'm not crazy about this one either, and I hope someone suggests a better 
alternative.
The justification for it is the fact that popular music doesn't last long.
Yes, other forms of music an be new, but that should not be a problem.
This is a lujvo, not the tanru {cnino zgike}.  Similarly, 'classical' music 
is written today (not much) usyally under the patronage of the state 
or public instututions.  Nonentheless, I think due to its origins, nolzgi 
still works.

> 
> 
> 
> > 8) zgitro
> > j1 conducts music z1 being performed by/at z2=j3 (event)
> > from
> > j1 jitro lonu z1 zgike z2=j3
> 
> I would prefer "zgigi'a" (zgike-gidva) (in fact, "conduct" is one of
> the gloss words of "gidva").
> 
Good, I agree!

P.S. No response from Japan for a Japanese wiki contact?

mu'o mi'e .andrus.