[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[jbovlaste] Re: crab
- To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: crab
- From: Stela Selckiku <selckiku@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:33:13 -0400
- Delivery-date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:35:00 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=qEQwIYTGG7rasVGy6J31wnIr7IGtEtSJrqPC9EdES3Y=; b=lmh0m6XxDUi23QB3UY1hkTcniulY7hOs2f3rX/JBJCz9TK6PihDMLDXz4MRSzi0UM3 RFjqEz8aD3zFxp8UMAkOoYeC2ZwL6KMOLuYaZ9eEe3w/FqbJon68yx5tT990UHdWqxPG PrWhe6V80pklaIO/WOIjuP/U14a6q1tx1Jt0s=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=ST9ZHm5jTuDCkEvNSNq4DzyYp3e/MZTL1E4L2H6E1Q1/Kt6o41kLuTngtmCSr09D96 V25yJSESW+NTnCsVqwkb6cgkrhGBCYmihaWra6TYFTAl0ObOB6V99KmwS6qhvNmO6Qqq 5TD3NR8iR8ubn0Dl+b/HCkzhXW/hn/Lw7BKmU=
- Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
- In-reply-to: <201009161103.17292.phma@phma.optus.nu>
- References: <201009161103.17292.phma@phma.optus.nu>
- Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> I think there should be a specific word for "crab". Looking at the words in
> various languages, I came up with two: "kangre'o" from Spanish, and
> "sartanu" from Arabic. Which do you think is better?
Trying them both on my tongue, I prefer "kangre'o". I feel like we've
had a bunch of the shape CVC/CVCV lately but I don't remember anything
else shaped CVC/CCV'V, that's a pretty shape.
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:46 AM, * Hieran Makhwali
<sarefo@googlemail.com> wrote:
> i haven't followed the discussion lately (if there was any), but
> wasn't it considered bad style to use brazenly cultural fu'ivla for
> non-cultural items?
Opinions differ of course, but I consider Pierre's fu'ivla the epitome
of good style. They're some of my favorite words, and I feel he's
added a lot to the beauty of our language.
I'd consider sacrificing aesthetics for supposed cultural neutrality
to be quite silly in a language that already has short rafsi for some
cultures and only long fu'ivla for others. And I'm not so convinced
anyway that there's something ideally neutral about scientific Latin.
mi'e la stela selckiku
mu'o