[jbovlaste] Re: Alice in Wonderland 13

["A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>]

> 
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 3:27 PM, A. PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
> >
> > 1) plicu'a
> >
> >  c1=p1 adopts/selects/chooses/accepts c2=p2 out of c3
> >
> > from
> > c1=p1 cuxna c2=p2 c3 tezu'e p2=c2 pilno p3
> 
> I can't parse that. I think it should  be something like:
> 
> ko'a cuxna ko'e ko'i te zu'e lo nu ko'a pilno ko'e ko'o
> "x1 adopts/selects x2 out of alternatives x3 for use x4

Of course. I have a congenital defect of treating {tezu'e} as an abstractor!
.> 
> > 2)
> > daftadji
> >
> > t1 finds a remedy for d2
> >
> > from
> > t1 tadji lo danfu be t3 ku d2
> >
> > gloss:
> >
> > arrive at solution
> > find a solution
> > find a remedy
> 
> x1 is the remedy, not the one who finds the remedy. There's no agent
> in either "danfu" or "tadji".
> 
> ko'a tadji lo danfu be ko'e (ko'i)
> "x1 is a remedy for x2 (under conditions x3)"
> 
But isn't {danfu} already a solution i.e. a remedy?  Thats why I was trying to 
treat the {tadji} part as 'coming up iwth a remedy'.

totus