[jbovlaste] Re: Esther Chapter 2

["A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>]

> 
> On Wednesday 14 October 2009 13:26:37 A. PIEKARSKI wrote:
> > But Pierre, unless it is clear that C.molmol is the generally accepted
> > form, why bother changing from C.myrrh?  It's just one guy's opinion
> > (Engler's) against another's (Nees').
> 
> Because "molmol" is easier to make a fu'ivla of.

That assumes you are talking about Type 4.  But for Type 3, why would 
ciblrmolmolo be preferable to ciblrmoru?  It's just longer.
> 

totus