[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[jbovlaste] Re: natural and human rights
- To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: natural and human rights
- From: "A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:59:59 -0800 (PST)
- Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:00:52 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s1024; t=1291823999; bh=++SlX1TjjADCHMwBFnkXi9XKx1Z6xMC80e3+XxmpDG0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=6kdbYLekNDE0tCKfUWZylTYJ8KY2036c8VboA8NKJWYRf8xasDE54cDUH0SeP8++oFvjR1pfSt7s1jKcbJcEdpckS6UzI7IrDfPRbUE29TG5RnyHwfcCjFnYAKkJJFwpqTtNhV2ANxZm+qQtm7ky3KuN/3OV6q1mgWRgwIAxdUE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=UJv/PWTMojhnfDlnmMWGBtd/cVY498RQCXSlHP0h9AGWTjs1O9SSxBGywxlOcjcnz7aT/ALWLRnOogjT6J2vLQyeHbHRfg0G5eiSUsadY/y8su+IHKHnDrCMm6/sURUwrpLvIbrmMr6Y7VnANYTyqrExp9TTMfF6kO/pvSJn0Xs=;
- Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
- In-reply-to: <201012081028.10788.phma@phma.optus.nu>
- References: <885332.19254.qm@web88003.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <201012081028.10788.phma@phma.optus.nu>
- Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
> >
> > Please comment:
> >
> > 1) mujyselpo'e
> >
> > p2 is a natural/inalienable right possessed by p1
> >
> > from:
> > p2 se ponse p1 lo munje
> >
>
> I wouldn't use "selpo'e" for "right", as there are lots of selpo'e that aren't
> rights. I own some computers, but they aren't rights. I have the right to own
> land, but I don't own land.
>
I'm not totally happy with {selpo'e} either, but we do 'possess' rights to
possess
certain things as well as the things themselves.
What do you think of {mujyselzi'e} and {remselzi'e}?
What would you use?
totus