[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[jbovlaste] Re: defining "debug"



On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 03:25:41PM +0000, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote:
> On 12/17/10 15:11, .alyn.post. wrote:
> 
> > Do we have several notions here, with cfisisku (or some variant)
> > expressing the idea of a QA/tester and
> 
> I like {cfisisku} for QA/testing:
> 
> > {(rafsi "troci" *)}
> > expressing the idea of debugging/diagnosis?  Can you make a better
> > suggestion?
> 
> /me gets out his tanru tweezers
> 
> I think the notion of 'cause' is key here. The experimental-method
> implication of {troci} is, I think, just one way of approaching fault
> diagnosis, although it is an important one, but I wonder if {rinka} is
> more important. {cfiri'asisku} - "flaw-causer seeking"? There's a nice
> symmetry there; one flaw-seeks, then flaw-cause-seeks (then {cikre}s the
> software... or {ciksi}s it away as a feature ;-).
> 
> > -Alan
> 

I like that.  +1.

-Alan
-- 
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi