[jbovlaste] Re: defining "debug"

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:30 AM, .alyn.post. <alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org> wrote:

I'm working on a lujvo for "debug," as in "locate and correct errors
in computer program code."

I've got:

cfila : c1 (property - ka) is a flaw/fault/defect in c2 causing c3.
sisku : s1 seeks/searches/looks for property s2 among set s3.

which creates the lujvo cfisisku, which one could define:

s1 debugs computer program c2 for flaw/property c1==s2 causing c3

I'd go with:

"s1 searches c2==s3 for flaw(s) c1==s2 causing c3"

I don't think "proof reader" is anymore apt than "debugger", I think both are equivalently {cfisisku}, the former being a {lo se tcidu cfisksku}, the latter a {lo samselpla cfisisku}.

{lo cfisisku} is merely an agent that searches for imperfections - a mechanic is a {lo karce cfisisku}, for instance.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )