[jbovlaste] Re: defining "debug"

[".alyn.post." <alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org>]

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 01:20:52PM -0700, Jonathan Jones wrote:
>    On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:30 AM, .alyn.post.
>    <[1]alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org> wrote:
> 
>      I'm working on a lujvo for "debug," as in "locate and correct errors
>      in computer program code."
> 
>      I've got:
> 
>      cfila : c1 (property - ka) is a flaw/fault/defect in c2 causing c3.
>      sisku : s1 seeks/searches/looks for property s2 among set s3.
> 
>      which creates the lujvo cfisisku, which one could define:
> 
>      s1 debugs computer program c2 for flaw/property c1==s2 causing c3
> 
>    I'd go with:
> 
>    "s1 searches c2==s3 for flaw(s) c1==s2 causing c3"
> 
>    I don't think "proof reader" is anymore apt than "debugger", I think both
>    are equivalently {cfisisku}, the former being a {lo se tcidu cfisksku},
>    the latter a {lo samselpla cfisisku}.
> 
>    {lo cfisisku} is merely an agent that searches for imperfections - a
>    mechanic is a {lo karce cfisisku}, for instance.

Thank you for catching the c2==s3 equivalence.  I missed that one.

-Alan
-- 
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi