[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[jbovlaste] Re: defining "debug"





On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 1:34 PM, .alyn.post. <alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 01:20:52PM -0700, Jonathan Jones wrote:
>    On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:30 AM, .alyn.post.
>    <[1]alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org> wrote:
>
>      I'm working on a lujvo for "debug," as in "locate and correct errors
>      in computer program code."
>
>      I've got:
>
>      cfila : c1 (property - ka) is a flaw/fault/defect in c2 causing c3.
>      sisku : s1 seeks/searches/looks for property s2 among set s3.
>
>      which creates the lujvo cfisisku, which one could define:
>
>      s1 debugs computer program c2 for flaw/property c1==s2 causing c3
>
>    I'd go with:
>
>    "s1 searches c2==s3 for flaw(s) c1==s2 causing c3"
>
>    I don't think "proof reader" is anymore apt than "debugger", I think both
>    are equivalently {cfisisku}, the former being a {lo se tcidu cfisksku},
>    the latter a {lo samselpla cfisisku}.
>
>    {lo cfisisku} is merely an agent that searches for imperfections - a
>    mechanic is a {lo karce cfisisku}, for instance.

Thank you for catching the c2==s3 equivalence.  I missed that one.

-Alan
--
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi

Sure thing, although I'd like to amend it to "s1 searches for flaw(s) s2/c1 in s3/c2 causing c3", to preserve order.

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )