[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[jbovlaste] Re: ci'erkei
- To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: ci'erkei
- From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:16:36 -0400
- Delivery-date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:17:36 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Y6L6Lr6CK8AiXJsUIzEkQ7V9iQXDBhh5P1mBO7MOoyw=; b=gP01jTmzNwrttf/G57tB4elTqtNLqkm9L1xOtZT/OLVGGYSEwE+9DBotSV+2+9qRUd hZDKKf7/XVzvhMeHiGTIj2sMWz8nANbJHCy9WHlpSjLmRsbLmT/1lVhGjOwbH6AhCQTV 9QyNhkd8PLo2CFiAHBsh+Sv6k8vT9iHrlOxzg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=JuRP+I3VjpHuqvDuNhfO4+lf6Lspz7TBCCNVTKFNpRXHrUfkZ5W4F6AFbTcnyWzbRg hLmFdKvDrqv4LYdfZh0pHd4qzeVZXcqwaC3b3pDvXSv3ieTRlOnxUMZ6nsrToHRRFE2w uM5ZMW20ZAgsyrECRyD328a5flt1we+/oO7jU=
- Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
- In-reply-to: <130411.96485.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
- References: <130411.96485.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:58 PM, A. PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
> coi ro do
>
>
> ci'erkei is found in gi'uste but not jbovlaste.
>
> So here is a proposed definition:
>
> k1 plays game k2=c1, governed by rules c2 interrelating game parts
> (physical or conceptual) c3
>
> which comes from:
>
> ciste: c1 (mass) system interrelated by structure c2 among
> components c3 (set) displaying c4 (ka)
> and
> kelci: k1 [agent] plays with plaything/toy k2
>
> I'm not really happy with c2 as 'structure' and "rules' are not
> quite the same to me, and we don't play with games but in them.
>
You play "in" Monopoly, Scrabble, Risk, etc? New to me!
--gejyspa