[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[jbovlaste] Re: kunkemgerplucpi

To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: kunkemgerplucpi
From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 09:50:35 -0500
Delivery-date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 06:54:14 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=THqfDyYuxxVWufZRwoDA6ip+qcb1a9t7fOFZdGvWfOk=; b=jEFbprQIAQPdjkahGgn5VCIGnWn8RwYPUpDucf4v3YGOTpDh7qds3wwhAraQ8eeWIS LpWapGGm2pOlPuq90MJkieNEm18jVOwwSelhMhddZkwEhmN6aCXroQvxC+S9n9eOcoXg LzYAf7JBxoDYzK7v2urX1/KizSnNvfYHKQsw4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=IfItnrabmWD00wzwHp99C/7Dg1Mt555X/p/XMy8SxyhMU2lZBgDPoXgqDyU7AANHoz MlGRkyQ48nGPIAhBKBe5nJYdtPsAlTb2ZFLpMlNyPHJ8qkbu8rggdVZGX4C2ZnPhSIFG 3EuMNZJCZJ8+DkFA/vSO9rGKfypeJTQR7ttII=
Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
In-reply-to: <201011250037.05069.phma@phma.optus.nu>
References: <201011250037.05069.phma@phma.optus.nu>
Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:

Is this word OK, or can the "kem" be removed, or does it need a "pev" in there
somewhere? I don't think it's OK to say "kunra gerplucpi" as it may not be a
literal gerplucpi.

I'm guessing, knowing my etymology, that a gerplucpi is a canary. But what the heck is a mineral canary?

--gejyspa

Follow-Ups:
- [jbovlaste] Re: kunkemgerplucpi
  - From: Zefram <zefram@fysh.org>

References:
- [jbovlaste] kunkemgerplucpi
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>

Prev by Date: [jbovlaste] Re: Alice in Wonderland 15
Next by Date: [jbovlaste] Re: kunkemgerplucpi
Previous by thread: [jbovlaste] kunkemgerplucpi
Next by thread: [jbovlaste] Re: kunkemgerplucpi
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread