On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Luke Bergen <
lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> After reading through the chapter on lujvo making in the CLL I'm beginning
> to wonder how important it really is to perfectly describe exactly what you
> want to mean.
> If I were making a tanru to mean "checker pattern" I might need to use vlina
> kurfa dasri morna. But if the true meaning of a lujvo comes from it's
> definition and not strictly it's component gismu (we remove {sel} and {nun}
> all the time) then do we really need to describe it perfectly with ba'u 50+
> gismu? Also, it seems to me that if only a couple of gismu are necessary to
> describe an idea without other ideas intersecting with it, why add more? Is
> there anything more obvious than "checker pattern" for kurfa morna to mean?
> Maybe later if someone wants to describe that pattern that a tic-tac-toe
> board makes they could make a bigger lujvo that pulls {linji} into it. But
> do we need to make every lujvo as big as the biggest lujvo necessary?
Do we 'need to make it as big as the biggest lujvo necessary'? :)