[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[jbovlaste] Re: jbovlaste erroneously states original creator as the person who edited a definition

--- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> schrieb:

> On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 08:45:24AM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote:
> > On 9/23/07, Matthias-Christian Ott <matthias.christian@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> > > > i just edited two or three definitions by ott and in the
> > > > recent changes list it says "definition update by ott".
> > >
> > > I noticed that too when editing your definitions ;). I agree
> > > that this behaviour is incorrect and confusing and should be
> > > changed. My suggestion is to use a revision controll system and
> > > a plain text storage for the text, so we wouldn't need the web
> > > interface (which is a bit buggy and has a slow insertion
> > > procedure). I vote for git, mercurial or darcs.
> > 
> > Do you want the Lojban language to not be developed by people who
> > don't know what that is? Or will you write the documentation that
> > will introduce them to it?
> 
> He means a private repository; just because something is in git
> doesn't mean everyone knows where it is or can access it.
> 
> -Robin
If you have a public repository and announce it on some web page,
everyone can get this information and can access it. Additionally you
have the benefits of distributed revision control systems, which is
quite huge.

--
Matthias-Christian


      Wissenswertes zum Thema PC, Zubehör oder Programme. BE A BETTER INTERNET-GURU!  www.yahoo.de/clever