[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[jbovlaste] Re: jbovlaste erroneously states original creator as the person who edited a definition
- To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: jbovlaste erroneously states original creator as the person who edited a definition
- From: "Matt Arnold" <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 08:45:24 -0400
- Delivery-date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 06:02:23 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=+/rH78fgucqJeaJTmK5nwHuqILc1v9zTc5/4hA9xEfc=; b=BKT7I2fj4i66XH1yR72cCwgtQGZbFtWDdX1+ISftZemnbDbo1kcf1+GTWK7C/FW3ZRxGIRy218m3ilYzUVttzlXUuj0BH96P96qYD7ZbjW1ItseT1Jt653DMVdpklkV47GCVwVe0kAsAfQdokM+lh6b4h6EUCeKJ3i07wvWLExA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jihXHsSvKY9doDqT3wtT54fNDq7yCvqkBonk8jmc2L5avJZyNh9ok3XCkssxcG8TaSlWtomULB1x2Kns7Q2qDi+82x98iYM9W6jYzh9cKTx7pqRbGmpuGlB1Kuw9u257/jPjE4SwjFW0ATG95szbh9EfQ1aO4Ggc7X9FexotwYI=
- Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
- In-reply-to: <482830.28303.qm@web28109.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
- References: <46F63C7C.8060103@perpetuum-immobile.de> <482830.28303.qm@web28109.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
On 9/23/07, Matthias-Christian Ott <matthias.christian@yahoo.de> wrote:
> > i just edited two or three definitions by ott and in the recent
> > changes
> > list it says "definition update by ott".
> > - Timo
>
> I noticed that too when editing your definitions ;). I agree that this
> behaviour is incorrect and confusing and should be changed. My
> suggestion is to use a revision controll system and a plain text
> storage for the text, so we wouldn't need the web interface (which is a
> bit buggy and has a slow insertion procedure). I vote for git,
> mercurial or darcs.
>
> Regards
> Matthias-Christian
>
Do you want the Lojban language to not be developed by people who
don't know what that is? Or will you write the documentation that will
introduce them to it?
-Matt