[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [jbovlaste] Is mathematical terminology jargon?
Your example still doesn't relate to the mathematical limit.
Maybe your confusion is that jimte fits this limit well:
but not this limit:
The first example illustrations should give it away pretty quickly why. One is is about approaching but never reaching, which makes sense for a "limit/bound" word like jimte, and the other is about approaching but sometimes while crossing repeatedly, which may fit as a "limit" but not as every other gloss word for jimte -- it's not an extreme, because the min and max fit that better, and it's not a bound or border or confinement, because supremum/infinum or upper/lower bound or topological boundaries all make more sense there.
This is not a matter of a liberal use of {jimte}, but of a sad naming of the original mathematical term. "limit" fits the mathematical definition very minimally to begin with. It is the result "at a limit," but it is not "limiting" at all.
_______________________________________________
jbovlaste mailing list
jbovlaste@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste