On 1/11/2013 4:55 PM, Eitan Postavsky
wrote:
Every terserspaji must be an unexpected stepping, not a surprised stepper, because every terserspaji is a spaji and every spaji is a surprising/startling/unexpected event/action, and terserti are neither events/actions nor spaji. Therefore, regardless of whether the arguments are mentioned in the order in which you intended their places to be (which I cannot ascertain because "x1" and "x2" are excluded), your place structure is flawed. I propose this alternative (which includes the serti, also, as an argument): x1=sp1 is an event/action of x2=sp2 unexpectedly stepping off stairs/stairway/steps x3=st2, instead of onto step x4=st3, or onto step x3=st4, instead of off stairs/stairway/steps x3=st2 I conjecture that it is "déjà vu," although {selsneselmojmo'i} is better, because what is recollected is the memory, not the entity that does the recollecting, and eliding one "sel" but not the other would be inconsistent. |
_______________________________________________ jbovlaste mailing list jbovlaste@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste