[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jbovlaste] Type-3 fu'ivla was: newlines




Skickat från min iPhone

2 maj 2013 kl. 00:05 skrev Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>:

> Should we add, for every type-3 fu'ivla, the form that uses the long rafsi? 
> Also there are some entries which are meant to be type-3 but aren't.
> 
>> jongausib - debrpisu
> 
> Valid type-3,  but uses the short rafsi.

Short rafsi often sounds better in my opinion and anyhow there's a natural tendency to look for the shortest form of a word.

> 
>> jongausib - grutratemoia
> 
> This is a type-4 as written. It should be "grutrxatemoia" or "grutrtemoia".

It should have been "grutrtemoia" I see now.
> 
>> jongausib - sparasparagu
> 
> I'd say "sparago".

"Sparsparagu"? I try to avoid fu'ivla-4 as they don't give any clue to what kind of thing you're speaking of, and in accordance to CLL recommendation, except in unique words like "iklki" or "fi'ikca".

> 
>> jongausib - sparaci
> 
> This is obviously a type-4 and I racked my brain trying to guess what it means 
> before looking it up and finding it's meant to be a type-3 for some plant I 
> never heard of.

"sparxaci"? As you can see I've started to add a fu'ivla for (almost) every genus of plants.

> 
>> jongausib - tsaprnigru
>> jongausib - tsaprpipali
> 
> These are well-formed, but do we need words for every species of pepper spice?

Yes we do, if we're some day are going to publish an international cookbook in lojban:)
> 
> Pierre
> -- 
> gau do li'i co'e kei do
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jbovlaste mailing list
> jbovlaste@lojban.org
> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste

_______________________________________________
jbovlaste mailing list
jbovlaste@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste