[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [jbovlaste] Type-3 fu'ivla was: newlines
Skickat från min iPhone
2 maj 2013 kl. 00:05 skrev Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>:
> Should we add, for every type-3 fu'ivla, the form that uses the long rafsi?
> Also there are some entries which are meant to be type-3 but aren't.
>
>> jongausib - debrpisu
>
> Valid type-3, but uses the short rafsi.
Short rafsi often sounds better in my opinion and anyhow there's a natural tendency to look for the shortest form of a word.
>
>> jongausib - grutratemoia
>
> This is a type-4 as written. It should be "grutrxatemoia" or "grutrtemoia".
It should have been "grutrtemoia" I see now.
>
>> jongausib - sparasparagu
>
> I'd say "sparago".
"Sparsparagu"? I try to avoid fu'ivla-4 as they don't give any clue to what kind of thing you're speaking of, and in accordance to CLL recommendation, except in unique words like "iklki" or "fi'ikca".
>
>> jongausib - sparaci
>
> This is obviously a type-4 and I racked my brain trying to guess what it means
> before looking it up and finding it's meant to be a type-3 for some plant I
> never heard of.
"sparxaci"? As you can see I've started to add a fu'ivla for (almost) every genus of plants.
>
>> jongausib - tsaprnigru
>> jongausib - tsaprpipali
>
> These are well-formed, but do we need words for every species of pepper spice?
Yes we do, if we're some day are going to publish an international cookbook in lojban:)
>
> Pierre
> --
> gau do li'i co'e kei do
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbovlaste mailing list
> jbovlaste@lojban.org
> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste
_______________________________________________
jbovlaste mailing list
jbovlaste@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste