[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[jbovlaste] Re: [jvs-watch] Per gejyspa: Etymology Added At Word kamjunmre

To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: [jvs-watch] Per gejyspa: Etymology Added At Word kamjunmre
From: Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 16:13:29 +0100
Delivery-date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 08:14:37 -0700
Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
In-reply-to: <E1Inap9-0002YE-0Y@pinfu.digitalkingdom.org>
References: <E1Inap9-0002YE-0Y@pinfu.digitalkingdom.org>
Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 07:15:07AM -0700, www-data wrote:
> 
> 
> In jbovlaste, the user gejyspa has added the following
> etymology to kamjunmre:
> 
> ka djuno kei mreli
> 
> You can go to <http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/kamjunmre> to see it.

The etymology field should not be used for Lojban-only etymologies (and should be used sparingly in lujvo).

-- 
Arnt Richard Johansen                                http://arj.nvg.org/
A: Because it messes up the natural order that people read things.
Q: Why is top posting bad?

Follow-Ups:
- [jbovlaste] Re: [jvs-watch] Per gejyspa: Etymology Added At Word kamjunmre
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>

Prev by Date: [jbovlaste] Re: jbovlaste erroneously states original creator?as the person who edited a definition
Next by Date: [jbovlaste] Re: [jvs-watch] Per gejyspa: Etymology Added At Word kamjunmre
Previous by thread: [jbovlaste] Re: jbovlaste erroneously states original creator?as the person who edited a definition
Next by thread: [jbovlaste] Re: [jvs-watch] Per gejyspa: Etymology Added At Word kamjunmre
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread