[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[jbovlaste] Re: [jvsw] New NatLang Word network node -- By totus
- To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: [jvsw] New NatLang Word network node -- By totus
- From: "A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
- Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:55:40 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s1024; t=1252518874; bh=vb2xEv0JnLzsvS8iIoYvJ6eIYWlW3yYwhKS/wpbEQi0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=IKJ48YLfLMr/9ip0lKodHhO2ECr+FhGRmMK/6UpNo9WbdwSukJi7JO/jdgdc8MMolidlmJHro7E50Ub1Yfoes0d20sNxgaQ29KZfoDi9q8rcmKTNAb0mOrXtVRrZJCmvKg3xVGETbWylnSbUuFurflr10zVuzYN8OyDMPV5uBvg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4n8dQbv8XfiMaCBn1IzT1n2eheFIRcj3u8U/DVOb5XRyTBCspMjHLSERKoyRnGXZYog0IJJQV+5kuNOxURV9uwWDoeOIyrMhDbedROAoan0JM9oHsifIHMr65zXYnslH96lFQJncsZacNtXIcGniWqEF1ftILWJPI7WimU5VBz4=;
- Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
- In-reply-to: <20090909163102.GI29029@digitalkingdom.org>
- References: <E1MlPR4-0008S2-Sz@oh-www1.lojban.org> <20090909160710.GJ2685@nvg.org> <20090909163102.GI29029@digitalkingdom.org>
- Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
----- Original Message ----
> From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
> To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
> Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2009 12:31:02 PM
> Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: [jvsw] New NatLang Word network node -- By totus
>
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 06:07:10PM +0200, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote:
> > > Word: network node
> > >
> > > In Sense: as in computer network
> >
> > > Word: network node
> > >
> > > In Sense: as in the Internet
> >
> > What is the difference between these two? Why does it need to have
> > a sub-sense at all? It is hardly a polysemous term.
>
The first could be a node in any computer network, past, present or future
e.g. Arpanet. The second refers to nodes specifically on the internet.
totus