> This means that both > right and wrong reviews will get mixed up without any means to comment > and/or challenge the reviews. Anyone should have the opportunity to > post comments on any review and the translator should have the option > to challenge the review while explaining why is he/she doing the > challenging. Since jboselkei in it's current form does not provide for > this, then it mixes up right and wrong reviews indiscriminately, > making it an unreliable source of learning material. you can of course always look at the Value of a review, which is calculated from the score of the user that did the review. > I regarded such an implementation to be top priority over anything > else, I went eagerly to see what changes were made. Boy, I was so > disappointed. The looks and feel of the game seemed to be top priority > rather than improving it's usefulness as a learning tool. well, actually i was only called to action by eppcott because he had a design that he wanted to be implemented and i did just that... and basically i have to apologise for my dukse lazni ness, but part of it is caused by my disliking of the uglyness of PHP. > As of now, > the list is the most realiable way to do what I suggested on my first > post on this subject. i have to agree.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature