[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban-beginners] Re: leaving a sumti out

To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: leaving a sumti out
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 12:38:01 -0400
In-reply-to: <2f91285f0705180844v32817552mdd45cbc05f2393f1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2f91285f0705180637r7b9fed73x7b6dcf13eb5eb6f2@mail.gmail.com> <1189A858F8918F43BE3F9C7603C73FB4031E7D3A@0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com> <2f91285f0705180844v32817552mdd45cbc05f2393f1@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
User-agent: KMail/1.9.5

On Friday 18 May 2007 11:44, Vid Sintef wrote:
> Would ".i le dunda lo cnino vanju botpi mi" be equally observative as ".i
> dunda lo cnino vanju botpi mi"?

No. "le dunda lo cnino vanju botpi mi" is three sumti waiting for a selbri.

phma

References:
- [lojban-beginners] leaving a sumti out
  - From: "Vid Sintef" <picos.picos@gmail.com>
- [lojban-beginners] Re: leaving a sumti out
  - From: "Turniansky, Michael [UNK]" <MICHAEL.A.TURNIANSKY@saic.com>
- [lojban-beginners] Re: leaving a sumti out
  - From: "Vid Sintef" <picos.picos@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: [lojban-beginners] Re: the ".i" after "lu"
Next by Date: [lojban-beginners] Re: leaving a sumti out
Previous by thread: [lojban-beginners] Re: leaving a sumti out
Next by thread: [lojban-beginners] Re: leaving a sumti out
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread