[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: lei and loi
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: lei and loi
- From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:03:41 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Nma7P9dNa4PvwbN/AcViMtcmg3xamA2E09xCCxGM0IY=; b=sKsxTRTblq1YnI9gKi4X8a4NKXJm5n/02rInRY+qhk/cFMxpwTp3BiQCERBv/K9uCw1ihMEBnLLMGww98j/7nY3l5fWu4BtcaYxvvlC79B7iQu9g3H+7okcG6kFIaZ0VPbCXc85tF/GibpROKKCiLlFMTiOVsgVDFvnT1UiDtSY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Q+iqbm55DYBFKkyIj/ZhZ4mSAJvCghRiU/UN35GSkjZXlg10ZHz9yEasyt1qd2XOPQTxBdlcd+oM3w2E0mZjBtdtv1bDQ+b+3QgDoug8uOUD4TlqOTToNjqDPVfaCc1UGx+Gf776DWW7GTGMUcG4kXg6plpWKGbxtvqo+EPVLL8=
- In-reply-to: <77DDB7B9-5579-4B4C-BBB7-190346543B69@umich.edu>
- References: <930718.57719.qm@web27704.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <77DDB7B9-5579-4B4C-BBB7-190346543B69@umich.edu>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
On 9/14/07, Alex Martini <alexjm@umich.edu> wrote:
>
> But {lu'o} isn't an article (a {gadri}) so you can't say {lu'o #
> broda} as far as I know.
You can, but only because {# broda} is a valid sumti,
a condensed form of {# lo broda}.
The # in {loi # broda} is an "inner quantifier", while the # in
{lu'o # broda} is an "outer quantifier".
That's as far as the syntax is concerned. The semantics of
{LAhE quantified-sumti} is problematic at least from a predicate
logic point of view.
mu'o mi'e xorxes