On Sunday 17 February 2008 15:43, David Cortesi wrote:
> per jbovlaste, complex number is {lujna'u} i.e. {pluja namcu}, a
> complicated type of number -- not pleasing to me, since it is more a
> two-dimensional number than one that is {pluja}.
Someone's suggested {relcimdyna'u}, which goes well with {voncimdyna'u}
for "quaternion".
Pierre