On Feb 18, 2008, at 3:28 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Sunday 17 February 2008 15:43, David Cortesi wrote:per jbovlaste, complex number is {lujna'u} i.e. {pluja namcu}, a complicated type of number -- not pleasing to me, since it is more a two-dimensional number than one that is {pluja}.Someone's suggested {relcimdyna'u}, which goes well with {voncimdyna'u}for "quaternion".
I don't like that very much. a two-dimensional number should be a vector, not a complex number. {lujna'u} I like better, because this is a composite number, just as {lujvo} is a composite word.
mi'e ioav