[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: A few small questions
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: A few small questions
- From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:23:39 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=fUymqUz6gNReoUZLK5MA2p56RXSXgryGpj0pi6ihsxU=; b=qwM0Ntb3bo99xm/FOr9z1QDX88aAF/ZtF9X5cRDExqliRSwHODWN1JgclPDsWtj9aSZwKX6a59yOcQIsdfImXxjVNso0vqT46WcrSqJVRwB8cCuE2vGPjxItJ5vXgK5YBR8JovbGjJc1PsIiEC0eMwQv0LjKefOlpJeyVGuA1/4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=krxuaH8ZDRkbdGrhc2eT9q1B2tvwtZwWGkKpN4dDKOF++AI9YAh7fSelDEREzACyzT9bnkAreLcYRb4M1SRfP8KlXUKmoWPDTVLP7494Gknqp8x7WxW11dighE7ncNjgqzhE7ARp5eKgipMoVSTy6csAO/fZLNNWiNCq/2G6hAQ=
- In-reply-to: <a25fac030804032218j5ce0a5sa46ca921c2300eb3@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <a25fac030804032218j5ce0a5sa46ca921c2300eb3@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
On 4/4/08, LakMeer Kravid <lakmeerkravid@gmail.com> wrote:
> coi rodo
>
> I have a few questions:
> 1) how does one assert "No/zero [somethings] exist"? Do I need to make
> a claim with {na zasti} or similar, or is there a way using numerals
> that's a bit more lobykai?
You can use {no}:
no crida cu zasti lo traji raclypre
"No fairies exist for the extreme rationalist."
> 2) I have a draft proposal for an original orthography, complete with
> truetype font. Where would be a good place to host it online for
> review and criticism?
Probably the wiki.
> 3) How badly would it screw with my grammar if I were to use a
> one-syllable rafsi in the place of a gismu, for rhythmic purposes in
> songwriting?
Very badly.
> It probably ceases to be parsable, but is it forgivable
> under the banner of 'artistic license'?
There are good chances it parses as something else.
mu'o mi'e xorxes