[lojban-beginners] Re: du'e preti

[Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>]

On Tuesday 15 April 2008 18:49, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> The official formal grammar and parser don't really handle "magic words",
> so I think the PEG is the most authoritative there is in that respect,
> though not official yet. The same could be said of the morphology section,
> which is not handled by the official formal grammar.

The morphology is still under debate (when we have any time to debate; I'm in 
school learning surveying) between me and Jorge. Mostly this affects obscure 
word-like forms such as "adjgja", "mastststststststaka", and "bongnanba", but 
it also affects a few meaningful words, such as "tarksako", "fasxolarkto", 
and maybe "soiombo". (This one, which refers to a Mongolian script and symbol 
and should really be either a cmevla or something followed by "bu", I haven't 
brought up before.)

Pierre