[lojban-beginners] Re: CAhA + ku

["Vid Sintef" <picos.picos@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
>  "other than right before the selbri and thus followed by a sumti" is not quite
>  right, it could be at the end of a bridi and thus neither before the selbri nor
>  followed by a sumti.

Yes, I know that. My apology. I'm still bad at English.

>  In answer to the question, yes, you need {ku}, otherwise it is a sumti tag
>  and forms a term together with the following sumti. Every selbri tcita
>  can also be used as a sumti tcita.
>
>  mu'o mi'e xorxes

I wonder what kind of meaning a CAhA can bear by governing a sumti. In
{ka'e mi do viska}, for example, what would be the translation of the
sumti tcita (ka'e mi)?

mu'o mi'e tijlan