[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: "This land is your land..."
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: "This land is your land..."
- From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 15:00:22 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=blEq9S2aXhYKm0vbdiJ+CR4DowYZUmKbpM8Qf82Le8M=; b=fu1aIoALVAkmlU2Y7Qd/tATaxSgEwKss0xaNIq0OemSwcluVVyq74pIcte18s5bQ1Jy4kiP3Y4OEJisLjieJ7uTUkaVHJWorMZN8WZ24emeI61HZw55D0rb6Qfh7BF1JIsQnszI2U2LX3rF+3pRLdBJ3WA8XWC7PVoKlHwTjDjg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ktYnO6MxL7zKDrp7Y3IdiFMxPxuZhIByeL0JBdsPEuj+cdJsgZ0w8DXzEjLz/TzuteGuuonFDUO6OqJdDNy343MbQ21odedhUi5JcksJO3DDZWghC8cDr28ijmwI8iwzHvYsFeqi7gHqbPVVrHOi042zs8k5nLHfsd/uGbtQ06o=
- In-reply-to: <bfd0fa520805161041l185f7438gfa9bea7f89fd3f25@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <bfd0fa520805161041l185f7438gfa9bea7f89fd3f25@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
On 5/16/08, David Cortesi <davecortesi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Literal: {lo vi tergugde} (and not sure about whether it should be {lo
> vi...} or {vi lo...} or ...
{lo vi}.
> Sloppy poetic: {le vi cesde'u}
You need to separate "sd": {cesyde'u}. A graveyard?
> Let's go with the literal. Obeying the stricture to avoid {du} for "is",
>
> { lo vi tergugde cu mintu ...}
{mintu} is for something being the same as something else, not for
two descriptions of a single thing.
>now, what is "your land"?
It could be {lo do tergu'e}, {lo tergu'e be do}...
You could say: {ti te gugde do}
mu'o mi'e xorxes