It is, unless you subscribe to the dotside philosphy. My apologies.On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 7:46 AM, <MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com> wrote:
> In a message dated 2009-01-21 07:38:15 Eastern Standard Time,
> mturniansky@gmail.com writes:
>
>
> (Although you can convert a la+cmevla to a selbri by sticking "me" in front
> of it -- la pamelas. du pa me la anderson. (Pamela is one of the Andersons)
> --gejyspa
>
>
> Is the "la" in "pamelas" a problem?
>
I should have said
la pamelys du pamela anderson.
--gy