Luke Bergen wrote:
> 2009/4/17 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
>
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
>>> la tcan. dunli la .en. le ka jgina .i la tcan. na du la .en .i xu la
>> tcan.
>>> mintu la .en?
>> .i la'a la .tcan. la .en. cu ja'a mintu su'o da gi'e ku'i na mintu ro de
>>
>> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>
> "probably chan and en are indeed the same by standard at least one something
> and however not the same as everything".
>
> I'm confused with your bridi. Where am I mis-translating?
I believe he meant to say {fi ro de} or {zo'e ro de}.
mu'o mi'e timos
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature