[lojban-beginners] Re: du & mintu

[Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>]

which would mean: "probably chan and en (interesting names) are indeed the same in at least some way but not in every other way".

If you've used "da" earlier does "ro de" have "da" as part of that?  Is "da" included in "ro de"?

 - Luke Bergen

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Timo Paulssen <timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote:

Luke Bergen wrote:
> 2009/4/17 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
>
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
>>> la tcan. dunli la .en. le ka jgina .i la tcan. na du la .en .i xu la
>> tcan.
>>> mintu la .en?
>> .i la'a la .tcan. la .en. cu ja'a mintu su'o da gi'e ku'i na mintu ro de
>>
>> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>

> "probably chan and en are indeed the same by standard at least one something
> and however not the same as everything".
>
> I'm confused with your bridi.  Where am I mis-translating?

I believe he meant to say {fi ro de} or {zo'e ro de}.

mu'o mi'e timos