[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: fu'ivla prefix
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: fu'ivla prefix
- From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:58:52 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fZJzzEt4D/5/JmqaFIcj3piJqGwqI5q8vEDH/GjBSP4=; b=IIL9MgxQJxhPvE9hk452zb6MgvGYlnZ7a/k71hPQwiCVBkx8vaRTG7EQ9vAhKpJxu4 9QCx20i3NxELrGE1ee5QRpasUvik/lvMJiLSswhV0Sef8mGHgXve2i5P4o/0oQVSsKQc uMFYBRs10NbJEXD5y546Xf6jYQPVwJ9xx54qI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IcYYZigHfD9I/2zGiaBbf7ttZ9GUcuJ+WzHx25nhbkknUffEuxIa7daCFbzrn3guK4 0ZtpWUNydit8cV9TyjvPhignyEJBYGciUGxOi7OxWKF32RYrcqB82iMJDTRylaeryYWO LMESlIiTgvVZMyB+9OVTtixvuE7tAAHwuLET8=
- In-reply-to: <4de8c3930905010308x13182716k9cc2640d3b37d3b5@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <4de8c3930905010308x13182716k9cc2640d3b37d3b5@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:08 AM, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it possible to prefix a fu'ivla with more than one rafsi? For example:
>
> zgikle-r-jazu (the genre of Jazz music)
> zgitadj-r-jazu (the techniques of Jazz music)
Both "zgiklerjazu" and "zgitadjrjazu" are valid fu'ivla forms, but
they are not type-3.
These three word forms:
CVC-r-C...V
CVCC-r-C...V
CCVC-r-C...V
happen to be valid fu'ivla no matter what you fill the gap with (as
long as you respect permissible clusters, and replace -r- with -n- or
-l- as necessary), so they are convenient patterns to form fu'ivla
without worrying that something will break down. Those three forms
only were called "type-3" fu'ivla.
Not every string of rafsi followed by -r-C...V will produce a valid
fu'ivla form. For example:
zgikle-r-kantri
is not a valid fu'ivla. "lo zgiklerkantri" will parse as a lujvo:
loz-gik-ler-kan-tri
So CCVCCV-r-C...V does not work as a general pattern for fu'ivla.
CCVCVCC-r-C...V on the other hand does always work, so if you want you
can add that form to your fu'ivla making patterns. Whether we call it
type-3 or type-4 is not really important. In fact, as long as the last
rafsi is a long (4-letter) rafsi, you could use any lujvo followed by
-r-C...V to form a valid fu'ivla), so "zgiklesrkantri" is valid.
mu'o mi'e xorxes