[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: fu'ivla, lebvla, le'avla
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: fu'ivla, lebvla, le'avla
- From: Stela Selckiku <selckiku@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 04:17:28 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0UTYCh0zw4VzJnsJuW6pArNbfVVcc5ILJrWT+7X8He4=; b=j2lIeQrn0bLeUcz6BelC70O6RCijRJxYiNZq/rylz84qHe361P9jBel/QzmXckyCxi 2bLEZaUA5LveopY5SUBqFes6/wd89mqSOFYIwlT8dqVsomLNFpNB6P+zwlzY9AGVfnCz 49AN7vqrkCqUnCgvRyN/Sj6mqmXxKqBPBGkEk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=U44tO7516g1R7e5ZW7oUx5TLxcVA57ecM674XUPf3DqK0N83i3n7gvX0FQ/9F/ZY2p lWA+jQnJagHZpUsE590i/230KqlXZShwV1jSUdm6TLfP7kV+u/lxW39F2X6MHh3myqqi cgDhrG3hC3bEKK15OmXhle+T56gS4e1HTzzEA=
- In-reply-to: <4de8c3930905041356u296cf5ahbc9f6f474427066d@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <4de8c3930905041356u296cf5ahbc9f6f474427066d@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:56 PM, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do they really have the same meaning? If so, which one of them is more
> preferable?
Take word, "le'avla", is an older depreciated word, and copy word,
"fu'ivla", is the newer term and normal these days.
Also, lately a few of us who take a broad minded approach to fu'ivla
have taken to sometimes using the word "zi'evla", zifre zei valsi,
free word.
mu'o mi'e la stela se ckiku