[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] fu'ivla, lebvla, le'avla
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] fu'ivla, lebvla, le'avla
- From: tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 22:56:27 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MQRB/AXx7OctoME1pcSlFoC/SqUIHuAsulqqJrm4CZs=; b=BKsmaJld5e9cgEY5TwR9UmWLiEfgoyW9yeDITKrpm3asnXFfOcKDgFY5FkehpVSZcb s4+5vQfywB99A6BjtVtd614H64EkUZGydZw7QmLxHd2LwKJzJYcufor45U4pyT4ZVy6r OUzaw5JSY0J0XMSig3E5zjw7e0dQ8vy73MTxQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pmhyuRXy3RUJVZNc4/EaTg4UecSpVAtd2HOr42P+fgHJrbIi3mV0ign/oovq4yiwBY gjhv5Wn2u6tQ5efOgUMaxRd+pkTMefPEbqLLZ0cii6fWNYY/Alldq1ZjtgF10Z9nnxB7 J85PiF6hYKC8d2QP8ws7Uo4yJF7wvcjTfIBrY=
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
In the word list, "le'avla" is used to explain such words as "na'u"
and "klerafsi". There is also "lebvla", as in "gimlebvla". "lebvla"
itself is defined as "loan word", which is what "fu'ivla" supposedly
means too.
Do they really have the same meaning? If so, which one of them is more
preferable?
mu'o se ckire spuda mi'e tijlan