[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: another oddity pe la jbofi'e
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: another oddity pe la jbofi'e
- From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:29:18 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yhfXo10oKR0p30tlpW6fUp1A2xK6/Ps8H+5rL2Ejb7U=; b=YYE2tkM/G77uErOw2XutES/nMGxUro2+/ItwYfI7/OSmoBTaFnQA2Xqor+4V8rQfGv pQoYw5c8NdkEjPrvMc5VaT1I8P+MfhrUwta8udJ/JfYtgs5eQWMkKs/cXOn3/Rtv5pcw wC68jnpXsPbEB9tRepVbhPoHpOi6uhX+XzeoU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cAu67cg3ohgHVLGBtbLCyD6j8/BZrV4sfGB+DiIYKIQncLQfPWt/Nq+taWwkVFcnUI vbN+AIG6CEFMgCAct5Imw6XxqiRABDh1jVhDZ52eH33a3Wa+Qer1YdDH1Q1pv+afu6Wi FiwQ36UsR8FGdKH91q8W7JFVr0KbSd3qKSdJE=
- In-reply-to: <20090611232213.GA3369@sdf.lonestar.org>
- References: <4de8c3930906111536u2b04041eqd107c1e6ec0df279@mail.gmail.com> <20090611232213.GA3369@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
On 6/11/09, Minimiscience <minimiscience@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Looking at the official grammar (and confirming this with the official
> parser), I don't think that's a bug in jbofi'e. It appears that a bare
> {lerfu} string cannot have any free modifiers attached to it
The PEG parser however does allow it, except when the free modifier is
"(number / lerfu-string) MAI", which does require the BOI to separate
one lerfu-string from another or from the number.
mu'o mi'e xorxes