[lojban-beginners] Re: la'o { adposition } jo'u { case marker }

[Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:30 AM, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:

2009/6/22 Jorge LlambÃas <jjllambias@gmail.com>

>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:39 AM, tijlan<jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Âklama ve'a lo dargu = klama fo lo dargu
> > Âklama ra'i lo zdani = klama fi lo zdani
> > Âklama fa'a lo zarci = klama fe lo zarci
>
> .i pe'i { fe'e co'a } fa'u { fe'e co'u } xagmau { ra'i } fa'u { fa'a }
> .i ju'o cu'i ji'a { fe'e ca'o } xagmau { ve'a }

 Actually, "teka'a", "seka'a", etc. would be best of all, because that's what they MEAN. But of course, that begs the whole question of "why are they "te X", "ve X", etc.? " "Oh, because that'ws the place structure of the underlying gismu...." back to square one.
ÂÂÂÂÂÂ --gejyspa