[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: Only one true dog
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Only one true dog
- From: Cebalo Jason <jason_andrew_cebalo@yahoo.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:10:24 -0800 (PST)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.au; s=s1024; t=1266894624; bh=HxsEKqWqTMSm+NeHT8McVK3FwUGP4onSAT71rJf5zuY=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=B4r8EwsbKmA0c3ikHFmmBjovq3JmS/FQ0cWnoLSyVzvHY/3qtot9HOqYqlFHYAw2vhodRNZxmnxy7BM8CeIcmWUaIh5dNeRraJ8A2/gDk9Td25Fv9NJJiu5l32iXfnL/CPihscfOiqMSNi2ypGpIPm5aRmhfMzEEs/hrj9+20I8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=p26E3/i88/G2WpsRk5D4ItPmaN0QYzuKeCfwP2xpJYxPbrhzPqxDL1mDjVr+fqeo9MhjB91/TreC01r/UYwxUb1EhpjIskaGX4KS4UokUBaivXCFslGRlYw3nC8Av4llLRe5QOLiun54DbAJ3yv4UJAoMvf1vxFrw9uXctz2vEs=;
- In-reply-to: <201002222134.18658.phma@phma.optus.nu>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Sincere thanks to both Pierre and Ian. I was wondering what would be wrong with "da po'o gerku"? A I understand it, "da" is the existentetial x, so if "la faidos po'o gerku" mean "Fido is the only dog" shouldn't "da po'o gerku" mean "there exists an x such that x is the only dog?
thanks again,
J.
>
> For "there is only one dog", you can say "ro pa da cu
> gerku". You can also
> use "po'o" as Ian said, "pa da po'o cu gerku". "pa po'o da
> cu gerku" means
> that one is the only number of dogs that exist, which
> happens to mean the
> same thing, but is a strange way of putting it, and in
> other
> constructions "pa po'o" or the like may result in a weird
> meaning.
>