Re: [lojban-beginners] Official stance on dots in names?

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 02:06:42PM -0601, .alyn.post. wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:30:04PM -0400, .arpis. wrote:
> >    e.g. {la .alyn.post.}
> > 
> >    jbofi'e is agreeable; camxes complains.
> > 
> >    Is there an official stance?
> > 
> >    --
> >    mu'o mi'e .arpis.
> > 
> 
> The portion of the grammar that parses this line, sumti-6, says in
> part:
> 
>   LA-clause free* relative-clauses? CMENE-clause+ free*
> 
> The '+' after the CMENE-clause being relevant.  That is the same in
> both camxes[1] and jbogenturfahi[2].  I assume camxes has a bug
> higher up than the grammar causing this clause to parse incorrectly.

No, lower down; it's a morphology complaint.  Bug xorxes.  :)

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.