Re: [lojban-beginners] Official stance on dots in names?

[".alyn.post." <alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org>]

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:30:04PM -0400, .arpis. wrote:
>    e.g. {la .alyn.post.}
> 
>    jbofi'e is agreeable; camxes complains.
> 
>    Is there an official stance?
> 
>    --
>    mu'o mi'e .arpis.
> 

The portion of the grammar that parses this line, sumti-6, says in
part:

  LA-clause free* relative-clauses? CMENE-clause+ free*

The '+' after the CMENE-clause being relevant.  That is the same in
both camxes[1] and jbogenturfahi[2].  I assume camxes has a bug
higher up than the grammar causing this clause to parse incorrectly.

1: https://github.com/lojban/camxes/blob/master/lojban.peg
2: http://bugs.call-cc.org/browser/release/4/jbogenturfahi/trunk/gerna.peg

-Alan
-- 
.i ma'a lo bradi cu penmi gi'e du

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.