On Nov 29, 11:19 pm, MorphemeAddict <
lytl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Someone (David Gowers?) recently (Aug. 17, 2011?) wrote:
>
> "You have an object in troci x2, but troci x2 is an abstraction. This is
> the same problem as with {mi djica lo plise} -- you don't desire an apple,
> you desire to possess an apple, or eat an apple... This is known as sumti
> raising. You need to put an abstraction in x2, then you will not be
> sumti-raising -- and will make sense, besides."
>
> I've wondered about this before. Why is wanting an object called
> sumti-raising? Why must the object (x2?) of {djica} be an abstraction? Is
> it simply because that's how the word was defined? If so, why was it
> defined that way?
>
> stevo
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to
lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.