On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Pierre Abbat
<phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
On Sunday, March 04, 2012 06:03:06 Jonathan Jones wrote:
> I'm sorry, I need an example of what you would consider having but not
> possessing to know what you mean.
mi javni do la .triktrak. i do ponse le kelci dacti .i mi tolcau pamu rokci
.ije do tolcau pamu drata rokci .iku'i do ponse ro cino rokci
I'm sorry, I don't understand that. First of all, "I am a rule mandating you within system Trick Track" makes no sense.
I'm going to assume that you meant something like {mi .e do se nunkei la.triktrak.}, and further, I'm going to assume that Trick Track is a game like Othello, based off your mentioning of two kinds of rocks.
ca lonu la.otelos. se nunkei ku re kelci cu punji lo blabi rokci pe lo pamoi kelci ge'u .e lo xekri rokci pe lo remoi kelci lo kelta'o
I can agree that it is possible for something to be associated with a person without it being in that person's possession, but I still don't see how you could, for example, have something in your hand, and it not be in your possession. You're literally holding it. Whether or not it belongs to you, it is currently in your possession.
ganai cino rokci cu cpana lo mi xance gi mi ralte cino rokci .i ganai pimu rokci cu srana lo remoi kelci gi mi ralte pamu rokci pe lo remoi kelci
mu'omi'e .pier.
--
La sal en el mar es más que en la sangre.
Le sel dans la mer est plus que dans le sang.