{ko'a broda be ko'e ko'i} and {ko'a broda ko'e ko'i} are exactly equivalent. "be" has no effect on the jufra in this case. The reason for this is because "be" says the next sumti is the x2 of the immediately preceding selbri and not to any outer selbri that may contain it. (For example, in {lo zarci be ko'a zasti} the selbri "zarci" is an inner selbri contained within the bridi of "zasti".) The sumti "ko'i" fills the next unfilled slot, x3, as per normal.--
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:40 AM, ianek <janek37@gmail.com> wrote:In a recent thread there seemed to be an assumption that {ko'a broda be ko'e ko'i} means the same as {ko'a broda ko'e ko'i}, ie. linked sumti eliminate the filled brivla places. Where is the source of this fact? I looked into http://dag.github.com/cll/5/7/ and didn't find it.mu'o mi'e ianek--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/ElCnRqErlfcJ.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
mu'o mi'e .aionys.
.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )