I need to correct myself a bit. There is a small grammatical difference, in that {broda be ko'e} is considered a tanru unit (for cases like {broda be ko'e brode}), but it has no effect on the meaning- ko'e still goes into the x2 of broda, and ko'i still goes into the x3.
If you need verification, put {.i ko'a broda be ko'e ko'i .i ko'a broda ko'e ko'i} into the parser:
camxes
jbofi'eOn Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote:
{ko'a broda be ko'e ko'i} and {ko'a broda ko'e ko'i} are exactly equivalent. "be" has no effect on the jufra in this case. The reason for this is because "be" says the next sumti is the x2 of the immediately preceding selbri and not to any outer selbri that may contain it. (For example, in {lo zarci be ko'a zasti} the selbri "zarci" is an inner selbri contained within the bridi of "zasti".) The sumti "ko'i" fills the next unfilled slot, x3, as per normal.
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.
.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.
.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )