Re: [lojban-beginners] What is the cmavo for converting brivla into an attitudinal?

[tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>]

On 8 May 2012 20:43, ianek <janek37@gmail.com> wrote:
> {ki'ai} is of selma'o COI, so it's grammatical for it to convert brivla (or
> even more complex selbri). So maybe the definition is misleading?

Yes, it's classified as COI, while the actual definition says
"attitudinal" (UI), which is usually differentiated from "vocative"
(COI).

Yes, a COI can grab a sumti or (if any) its content selbri / cmevla
(without the gadri) to specify the referent of {do} that's implied by
the meaning of the COI cmavo itself. But is that really a
'conversion'?

mu'o

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.