On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 5:50 AM, tengo
<yurock.tengo@gmail.com> wrote:
There are also other ways to confuse people, so your example just adds
to that number. :) For another example, consider heavy use of FA and
SE:
fi la .man. la .filadelfias. te se ve klama fa la .ostin.
From a similar discussion at this group I gathered that jbofi'e
interprets {mi do dunda be ti} is correctly. For those who wonder,
here is how it works.
{dunda}
x1 gives x2 to x3
When you attach a sumti to brivla with {be}, it fills one of brivla's
places and deletes it from numbered place structure of selbri.
{dunda be ti}
x1 gives this to x2
Why did {be} put {ti} in dunda2 instead of dunda1 (the first place) or dunda3 (the next unused place in {mi do dunda be ti})?
stevo
Then {mi} and {do} fill the x1 and x2 of the resulting selbri.
{mi do dunda be ti} = {mi dunda be ti do}
I give this to you.
Although, my opinion about this interpretation is not backed by
official sources. I may need to read more.