> On Dec 2, 2012, at 10:14 AM, ianek <
jane...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 2 Gru, 14:02, Jonathan Jones <
eyeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 2:48 AM, la gleki <
gleki.is.my.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, December 2, 2012 1:32:48 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
>
> >>>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 1:03 AM, la gleki <
gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Sunday, December 2, 2012 11:15:01 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, la gleki <
gleki.is...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> On Sunday, December 2, 2012 10:50:42 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 11:09 PM, la gleki <
gleki.is...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Sunday, December 2, 2012 1:30:39 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:17 AM, tijlan <
jbot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 1 December 2012 12:09, ianek <
jan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is just what {se srana} or {selra'a} is.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> An about, a thematic focus, is more specific than that. cfika2, for
> >>>>>>>>>>> instance, may be as much relevant to cfika1 as cfika3 may be -- a
> >>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>> of fiction cu srana both its plot and its author (and possibly many
> >>>>>>>>>>> other things). Consider:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> la .alis. cfika sera'a lo nixli
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> This doesn't necessarily say that the plot revolves around a girl
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> it could as well be saying the work is dedicated to a girl.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> I'm sorry, I don't see how anything based on {srana} could possibly
> >>>>>>>>>> mean "dedicated to". You'll have to explain.
>
> >>>>>>>>> Well, may be it's not that something is wrong with {sera'a/pe/srana}
> >>>>>>>>> but rather wrong usage and/or glossing.
>
> >>>>>>>>> *srana x1 pertains to/is germane/relevant to/concerns/is
> >>>>>>>>> related/associated with/is about x2.*
> >>>>>>>>> *ckini x1 is related to/associated with/akin to x2 by relationship
> >>>>>>>>> x3.*
>
> >>>>>>>>> If we arbitrarily chose parts of those definitions we'd get
> >>>>>>>>> * srana x1 is relevant to x2
> >>>>>>>>> ckini x1 is relevant to x2
> >>>>>>>>> *
> >>>>>>>>> which is nonsense.
>
> >>>>>>>> ckini wouldn't be that. For one thing, you left out the x3, and for
> >>>>>>>> another, it isn't "relevant", it's "related". The Cold War isn't relevant
> >>>>>>>> to WWII, but it is related (by being a direct result of it).
>
> >>>>>>> Sorry, it should be
> >>>>>>> * srana x1 is releted to x2*
> >>>>>>> * ckini x1 is related to x2 by relationship x3*
>
> >>>>>> Well, by that definition, srana is {ckini fi zi'o}, which makes them
> >>>>>> synonyms in the same way that litru is to klama (litru = {klama zi'o zi'o}).
>
> >>>>> Haven't you read my previous post? I mean that choosing words from full
> >>>>> definitions ARBITRARILY can lead to this result which is nonsense.
> >>>>> ju'o it's all bad glossing.
> >>>>> I suggest that srana refers to topic and ckini means "to be associated
> >>>>> with".
> >>>>> to dedicate is {finfriti}, {tecu'u} etc.
>
> >>>> No, ko'a srana ko'e means that ko'a is relevant to ko'e, i.e. ko'a has
> >>>> something to do with ko'e.
>
> >>>> While it is true that the topic of something is pertinent, something
> >>>> which is pertinent is not necessarily the topic.
>
> >>> Then what is your opinion about my first post? Is it true that "topic"
> >>> brivla has right to exist on it's own?
>
> >> My opinion is that sera'a serves the purpose. As I said, "that which is
> >> pertinent to A" is a superset of "the topic of A".
>
> > So what? By analogy: why would we have {mlatu} when it's clearly a
> > subset of {danlu}, so danlu serves the purpose of "x1 is a cat"?
>
> > mu'o mi'e ianek
>
> >>> Roosevelt is pertinent to the Great Depression, but he is most certainly
> >>>> /not/ the topic of it.
>
> >>>>> (Btw, in my view, zi'o doesn't say that there is no such thing as
> >>>>>> whatever place it's in, but just that it's not important. For example,
> >>>>>> {ko'a klama zi'o zi'o ...} doesn't mean there /isn't/ an origin or
> >>>>>> destination, it just means that they don't matter. Dissenters should use
> >>>>>> zo'e instead.)
>
> >>>>> I think the CLL says almost the same.
>
> >>>>>>>>> If {srana} really gives us thematic role then all the other "is
> >>>>>>>>> relevant to" meanings can be assigned to {ckini/seki'i}.
>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>
> >>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
> >>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>>> Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
> >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visithttps://
groups.google.com/d/**
> >>>>> msg/lojban-beginners/-/**UZopTp21hiIJ<
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/UZopTp21hiIJ>
> >>>>> .
>
> >>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.**com.
> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@**
> >>>>>
googlegroups.com.
>
> >>>>> For more options, visit this group athttp://
groups.google.com/**
> >>>>> group/lojban-beginners?hl=en<
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en>
> >>>>> .
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>
> >>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
> >>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
>
> >>>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >>> "Lojban Beginners" group.
> >>> To view this discussion on the web visit
> >>>
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/kQJ2iFS5UZ4J.
>
> >>> To post to this group, send email to
lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>
lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
>
> >> --
> >> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>
> >> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
> >> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.