Re: [lojban-beginners] Just to double check, about {da} and quantifiers

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 3:51 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
> {ro da} implies {su'o da}?

Except in the extremely rare and rather pointless case of an empty
universe, yes.

> i.e. {broda ro da na gi'a broda su'o da}
>
> Tangentially, is there an accepted way of asking "...doesn't it?" That is,
> making a statement and asking for confirmation.

I use "ie pei" or  "pe'i pei".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.