2011/5/30 Jorge Llambías
<jjllambias@gmail.com>
> {ro da} implies {su'o da}?
Except in the extremely rare and rather pointless case of an empty
universe, yes.
That exception is the key point of question:
Specifically, in the restricted case,
(assuming there are no cat-dogs in the universe) what does {ro da poi ke'a gerku je mlatu cu broda} mean? Is it false, true, meaningless? I'm aware that this is related to the "lo no" discussion, but I think this is slightly more basic and answerable.
> i.e. {broda ro da na gi'a broda su'o da}
>
> Tangentially, is there an accepted way of asking "...doesn't it?" That is,
> making a statement and asking for confirmation.
I use "ie pei" or "pe'i pei".
mu'o mi'e xorxes
--