On May 30, 2011 6:48 PM, ".arpis." <
rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/5/30 Jorge Llambías <
jjllambias@gmail.com>
>
>> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 3:51 PM, .arpis. <
rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > {ro da} implies {su'o da}?
>>
>> Except in the extremely rare and rather pointless case of an empty
>> universe, yes.
>>
>
> That exception is the key point of question:
>
> Specifically, in the restricted case,
> (assuming there are no cat-dogs in the universe) what does {ro da poi ke'a
> gerku je mlatu cu broda} mean? Is it false, true, meaningless? I'm aware
> that this is related to the "lo no" discussion, but I think this is slightly
> more basic and answerable.
>
>>
>> > i.e. {broda ro da na gi'a broda su'o da}
>> >
>> > Tangentially, is there an accepted way of asking "...doesn't it?" That
>> is,
>> > making a statement and asking for confirmation.
>>
>> I use "ie pei" or "pe'i pei".
>>
>> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Lojban Beginners" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>
lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> mu'o mi'e .arpis.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
>